<p dir="ltr">I like the way the design folds up. I don't understand why people design pads where there are long legs in full contact with the ground. It makes sense in a perfectly flat world but I don't want to carry a bucket of 2X4 pieces to shim the legs with. Maybe I am looking for too elegant a solution.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mar 13, 2015 2:08 PM, "Thomas (Tweeks) Weeks" <<a href="mailto:tweeks@rackspace.com">tweeks@rackspace.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Any of you guys ever had experience with one of these? Looks very simple and<br>
effective:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.jcrocket.com/prorailbase.shtml" target="_blank">http://www.jcrocket.com/prorailbase.shtml</a><br>
<br>
Here's a good thread about various iterations:<br>
<a href="http://www.rocketryforum.com/showthread.php?39214-Custom-Launch-Pad-
Gallery&highlight=custom+launch+pad" target="_blank">http://www.rocketryforum.com/showthread.php?39214-Custom-Launch-Pad-<br>
Gallery&highlight=custom+launch+pad</a><br>
<br>
I think our club's general requirements are that it be sturdy enough to handle<br>
a 50lb bird.. and utilize a 1010 rail and larger 1515 rail..<br>
<br>
Tweeks<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
NRVR-Members mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NRVR-Members@nrvr.org">NRVR-Members@nrvr.org</a><br>
<a href="http://nrvr.org/mailman/listinfo/nrvr-members" target="_blank">http://nrvr.org/mailman/listinfo/nrvr-members</a><br>
</blockquote></div>